Why Are Hedge Funds Getting Clipped?

Why Are Hedge Funds Getting Clipped?

It has been a tough couple of years for the hedge fund industry.  The HFR Global Hedge Fund Index showed returns of -0.6% in 2014, -3.6% in 2015, and +0.8% through 8/31 of this year significantly underperforming the S&P 500 which returned +13.7%, +1.4%, and +7.8% during the same periods.  This was not a case of industry lightweights pulling down the average.  Well known funds such as Pershing Square, Glenview, Tiger Global, and Paulson have all reportedly struggled.  Investors who had been promised “equity like returns with less volatility” may have experienced the less volatility part, but are understandably frustrated with the returns.

One early response has been to decry the “outrageous” fees that hedge funds charge.  Fees are high and while I applaud efforts to reduce them, I still find this complaint somewhat curious.  While lower fees would have helped, they wouldn’t have closed the gap in performance.  I think part of the noise is a product of envy, as it is a sometimes awkward fact that hedge fund managers make a lot more money than the allocators who invest in them.  I would argue that hedge fund fees are lower than private equity or private real estate fees1 while offering better liquidity, but the cacophony regarding hedge fund fees is much louder.  At the end of the day it is all about net (after fee) performance and as hedge funds have underperformed (as reported by the New York Times), several high profile investors such as CALPERS, AIG, MetLife, and NYC’s pension have greatly reduced or eliminated their exposure.

If it’s not all fees, what went wrong?

There are several candidates, but I will focus on three:

  • The first is expectations.  It may not have been obvious ten years ago (at least not to me, Warren Buffet on the other hand made this bet), but “Equity like returns with less volatility” certainly seems unrealistically ambitious today.  However, less volatile, uncorrelated returns can still be a useful part of an investor’s portfolio.
  • The second more obvious answer to what went wrong is security selection.  Managers simply picked the wrong stocks.  The best performing stocks recently have been high dividend paying.  Utilities for example are up almost 20% this year.  I wouldn’t expect hedge fund managers to buy utility stocks and clip dividends, so it doesn’t surprise me that they have underperformed in this environment.
  • The third issue is size.  A recent academic article by Chengdong Yin of Purdue argues that the temptation for managers to grow beyond their optimal size has been too great to resist.  Many investors have decried the growth of the industry as one of the hindrances to performance, but research from Barclays indicates that it is not the size of the industry, but rather the size of the funds that is the problem.  This makes sense to me.  In order for big funds to make trades that move the needle for their performance, they need to make big investments and this reduces their investable universe.  The bigger the fund, the smaller the universe, the smaller the universe the harder it is to generate returns.  CALPERS has a similar problem.  It’s not worth their while to invest in smaller funds.  That, combined with disappointing performance by larger funds, makes it sensible for them to exit the space, but…

Does this mean it is the right time for everyone to leave all hedge funds?

It is common investment advice to encourage contrarian behavior – to buy when everyone else is selling – but the reality of investing is more complex.  The 10-year U.S. Treasury currently yields a measly 1.70%.  The S&P 500 is trading at the highest price to earnings multiple since 2009.  Given the current equity and fixed income markets, this could be exactly the wrong time to leave hedge funds.  Partly as a result of investor demands, and partly due to the increased number of funds competing for investors’ dollars, fees are starting to come down.  Smaller investors, who have both the ability to invest in smaller funds and the capability to identify high quality managers, may be well served to stay invested, but to rotate into less crowded strategies and more nimble funds.  These funds may bring uncorrelated returns to a portfolio in an environment just when those returns are needed most.  While it is certainly understandable for hedge fund investors to be fed-up with returns from more plain vanilla allocations, I continue to believe hedge funds, and alternative investments in general, represent an important asset class that can provide meaningful and differentiated returns over time.

1 PE and RE fees are multilayered and complex and it is difficult to compare them with hedge fund fees.  In my opinion, PE and RE fees are higher in general, but there are certainly scenarios under which hedge fund fees would be higher.

Articles and Commentary

Information provided in written articles are for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. There is a risk of loss from investments in securities, including the risk of loss of principal. The information contained herein reflects Sand Hill Global Advisors' (“SHGA”) views as of the date of publication. Such views are subject to change at any time without notice due to changes in market or economic conditions and may not necessarily come to pass. SHGA does not provide tax or legal advice. To the extent that any material herein concerns tax or legal matters, such information is not intended to be solely relied upon nor used for the purpose of making tax and/or legal decisions without first seeking independent advice from a tax and/or legal professional. SHGA has obtained the information provided herein from various third party sources believed to be reliable but such information is not guaranteed. Certain links in this site connect to other websites maintained by third parties over whom SHGA has no control. SHGA makes no representations as to the accuracy or any other aspect of information contained in other Web Sites. Any forward looking statements or forecasts are based on assumptions and actual results are expected to vary from any such statements or forecasts. No reliance should be placed on any such statements or forecasts when making any investment decision. SHGA is not responsible for the consequences of any decisions or actions taken as a result of information provided in this presentation and does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this information. No part of this material may be (i) copied, photocopied, or duplicated in any form, by any means, or (ii) redistributed without the prior written consent of SHGA.


Video Presentations

All video presentations discuss certain investment products and/or securities and are being provided for informational purposes only, and should not be considered, and is not, investment, financial planning, tax or legal advice; nor is it a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. Investing in securities involves varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that any specific investment will be profitable or suitable for a particular client’s financial situation or risk tolerance. Past performance is not a guarantee of future returns. Individual performance results will vary. The opinions expressed in the video reflect Sand Hill Global Advisor’s (“SHGA”) or Brenda Vingiello’s (as applicable) views as of the date of the video. Such views are subject to change at any point without notice. Any comments, opinions, or recommendations made by any host or other guest not affiliated with SHGA in this video do not necessarily reflect the views of SHGA, and non-SHGA persons appearing in this video do not fall under the supervisory purview of SHGA. You should not treat any opinion expressed by SHGA or Ms. Vingiello as a specific inducement to make a particular investment or follow a particular strategy, but only as an expression of general opinion. Nothing presented herein is or is intended to constitute investment advice, and no investment decision should be made based solely on any information provided on this video. There is a risk of loss from an investment in securities, including the risk of loss of principal. Neither SHGA nor Ms. Vingiello guarantees any specific outcome or profit. Any forward-looking statements or forecasts contained in the video are based on assumptions and actual results may vary from any such statements or forecasts. SHGA or one of its employees may have a position in the securities discussed and may purchase or sell such securities from time to time. Some of the information in this video has been obtained from third party sources. While SHGA believes such third-party information is reliable, SHGA does not guarantee its accuracy, timeliness or completeness. SHGA encourages you to consult with a professional financial advisor prior to making any investment decision.

Recent Posts

Dec 11, 2024
CNBC Squawk Box: Market Trends | December 11, 2024
Sand Hill News
Sand Hill News
CNBC Squawk Box: Market Trends | December 11, 2024

Brenda Vingiello, Sand Hill’s Chief Investment Officer, joined Squawk Box to discuss her thoughts on the latest market trends and market outlook for 2025. This

read more
Oct 29, 2024
Can the Bull Market Continue to Run?
Mark Strahs
Mark Strahs
Can the Bull Market Continue to Run?

Following the post-COVID stimulus hangover in 2022, the bull market has continued to run. One of the key factors was the Federal Reserve’s decision to

read more
Oct 29, 2024
Positioning for the Future
Brenda Vingiello
Brenda Vingiello,  CFA
Positioning for the Future

For the past decade, the list of the largest publicly traded U.S. companies has consistently been dominated by many of the same technology firms. These

read more

Stay up to date, receive email updates from Sand Hill directly to your inbox!